Used buying checklist
Mitsubishi Pajero reliability, common problems and used buying checks
A used Mitsubishi Pajero looks worse than average for reliability in UK MOT data: 22.6% of 2,523 tests failed, compared with 18.7% across all indexed models. A good example should have a clean MOT history for corrosion and structure, emissions, engine, and exhaust, and suspension and steering.
It can be, if the exact car has a clean history for corrosion and structure, emissions, engine, and exhaust, and suspension and steering.
Start with corrosion and structure, emissions, engine, and exhaust, and suspension and steering, then compare the car's mileage and recall record below.
Sources used: DVSA MOT tests (Apr 2026); vehicle recalls (Apr 2026); MOT fault wording (May 2025). MOT data does not capture every reliability issue, especially intermittent engine, gearbox or infotainment faults that do not appear during the test.
- 22.6% MOT failure rate
- Median tested mileage 137,852 miles
- 571 failed MOT tests analysed
Corrosion and structure is the clearest area to check
Corrosion and structure is the clearest named problem area in this model's MOT history (108.1 MOT notes per 100 tests). Example MOT phrases from this area include excessively corroded, or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a body mounting, and prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength.
Example MOT phrases to search in the car's history:
- excessively corroded
- or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a body mounting
- prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength
- excessively corroded within 30cm of towbar mounting
- leaking excessively from engine
- has a major leak of exhaust gases
- Fuel Pipe/s corroded
- emits clearly visible black smoke during acceleration
- ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt
- ball joint excessively worn
Focus on corrosion and structure, emissions, engine, and exhaust, and suspension and steering
The model's recorded failure rate is 22.6%, +3.9 percentage points compared with the average across all models. Use the seller questions below to check whether repeat MOT notes have actually been repaired.
- MOT tests analysed2,523 tests
- Median tested mileage137,852 miles
- Failed MOT tests571
Should you buy a used Mitsubishi Pajero?
77.4% of the MOT tests we analysed for this model passed. The model's recorded failure rate is 22.6%, +3.9 percentage points compared with the average across all models. This is a buying brief for the exact car in front of you: clean repeat history matters more than badge reputation.
- Repeat unresolved MOT notes for corrosion and structure, emissions, engine, and exhaust, and suspension and steering
- corrosion and structure appearing across more than one MOT
- Any dangerous MOT failure on the exact car, especially if the same area appears again later
- No paperwork showing applicable recall work has been completed
- A seller who cannot explain MOT wording such as "excessively corroded"
It can be, if the exact car has a clean history for corrosion and structure, emissions, engine, and exhaust, and suspension and steering.
Start with corrosion and structure, emissions, engine, and exhaust, and suspension and steering, then compare the car's mileage and recall record below.
Corrosion and structure is the clearest named problem area in the MOT history (108.1 MOT notes per 100 tests). These counts are issue notes, not failure rates, because a single MOT can list several faults.
Past 100k miles on the Mitsubishi Pajero, MOT records most often point to corrosion and structure, emissions, engine, and exhaust, and suspension and steering.
The MOT failure rate rises from 17.9% at 0-3 years to 23.1% at 15+ years. Compare the car with the nearest age range before treating a fault as normal wear or a warning sign. The average MOT failure rate across all models in the same dataset is 18.7%.
Start with corrosion and structure, emissions, engine, and exhaust, suspension and steering, and lights and electrical. The checklist on this page explains why each area is being recommended, what to inspect, and what to ask the seller.
1 relevant recall notice appear for this model. Treat them as safety checks to verify for the exact car, not as normal MOT wear.
What should I check first?
Start with corrosion and structure, emissions, engine, and exhaust, suspension and steering, and lights and electrical. The checklist on this page explains why each area is being recommended, what to inspect, and what to ask the seller. Each item shows whether it comes from MOT results, recall notices, or a standard used-car check.
-
Corrosion and structure Seen in MOT results
Corrosion and structure is one of the most common MOT problem areas for this model (108.1 MOT notes per 100 tests).
What to check: Inspect sills, subframes, mounting points, arches, and underside corrosion advisories.
-
Emissions, engine, and exhaust Seen in MOT results
Emissions, engine, and exhaust is one of the most common MOT problem areas for this model (44.2 MOT notes per 100 tests).
What to check: Check warning lights, smoke, exhaust leaks, recent emissions failures, and service history.
-
Suspension and steering Seen in MOT results
Suspension and steering is one of the most common MOT problem areas for this model (40.0 MOT notes per 100 tests).
What to check: Listen for knocks, check uneven tyre wear, and inspect steering play.
-
Lights and electrical Seen in MOT results
Lights and electrical is one of the most common MOT problem areas for this model (14.2 MOT notes per 100 tests).
What to check: Check every lamp, warning light, horn, battery condition, and dashboard messages.
-
Windscreen, wipers, and mirrors Seen in MOT results
Windscreen, wipers, and mirrors is one of the most common MOT problem areas for this model (8.0 MOT notes per 100 tests).
What to check: Check windscreen damage, wiper operation, washers, mirrors, and demisting.
-
Tyres and wheels Seen in MOT results
Tyres and wheels is one of the most common MOT problem areas for this model (1.7 MOT notes per 100 tests).
What to check: Check tyre age, tread depth, sidewall damage, wheel condition, and alignment wear.
What changes with mileage?
Past 100k miles on the Mitsubishi Pajero, MOT records most often point to corrosion and structure, emissions, engine, and exhaust, and suspension and steering.
Common MOT problem areas
Common faults: what usually fails on this model?
Corrosion and structure is the clearest named problem area in the MOT history (108.1 MOT notes per 100 tests). These counts are issue notes, not failure rates, because a single MOT can list several faults.
Recall-related areas to verify
Official recall areas
Manufacturer recall notices for the Mitsubishi Pajero mainly involve one area: seatbelts and safety systems. Treat each as something to verify on the specific car you are viewing; the recall table below shows the official notice text.
Mileage and age checks
Mileage changes: what starts showing up after high mileage?
Past 100k miles on the Mitsubishi Pajero, MOT records most often point to corrosion and structure, emissions, engine, and exhaust, and suspension and steering. On lower-mileage cars, the most common named areas are suspension and steering, corrosion and structure, and lights and electrical.
| Mileage range | Tests | Vehicles | Failure rate (vs all models) | Median mileage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-50k | 69 | 59 | 11.6%+0.8 percentage points vs all models | 39,892 miles |
| 50-100k | 490 | 399 | 20.8%+0.1 percentage points vs all models | 81,346 miles |
| 100-150k | 893 | 724 | 22.8%-3.4 percentage points vs all models | 125,820 miles |
| 150-200k | 652 | 529 | 23.3%-4.0 percentage points vs all models | 173,707 miles |
| 200k+ | 391 | 312 | 26.9%+0.3 percentage points vs all models | 234,132 miles |
Problem areas by mileage
Past 100k miles on the Mitsubishi Pajero, MOT records most often point to corrosion and structure, emissions, engine, and exhaust, and suspension and steering.
| Mileage range | Car areas most often recorded | Specific MOT defect examples |
|---|---|---|
| 0-50k |
|
|
| 50-100k |
|
|
| 100-150k |
|
|
| 150-200k |
|
|
| 200k+ |
|
|
Fair comparisons: is this problem normal for its age?
The MOT failure rate rises from 17.9% at 0-3 years to 23.1% at 15+ years. Compare the car with the nearest age range before treating a fault as normal wear or a warning sign. The average MOT failure rate across all models in the same dataset is 18.7%. The highest failure rate by age is 23.1% for 15+ years cars, based on 2,271 tests.
| Age range | Tests | Vehicles | Failure rate (vs all models) | Median age |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-3 years 2023–2026 reg. |
28 | 23 | 17.9%+9.4 percentage points vs all models | 2.4 years |
| 3-6 years 2020–2023 reg. |
58 | 47 | 19.0%+8.4 percentage points vs all models | 4.9 years |
| 6-10 years 2016–2020 reg. |
87 | 72 | 16.1%-0.5 percentage points vs all models | 7.5 years |
| 10-15 years 2011–2016 reg. |
79 | 64 | 20.3%-3.3 percentage points vs all models | 13.1 years |
| 15+ years pre-2011 reg. |
2,271 | 1,779 | 23.1%-2.8 percentage points vs all models | 19.4 years |
Recall records and data freshness
Recall context: are there safety notices to know about?
1 relevant recall notice appear for this model. Treat them as safety checks to verify for the exact car, not as normal MOT wear.
| 2021-07-25 | THE AIR BAG INFLATOR MIGHT HAVE A DIFFERENT AIR BAG DEPLOYMENT PERFORMANCE THAN DESIGNED PROVIDING LESS PROTECTION The airbag inflator might have a different airbag deployment performance than designed providing less protection. The driver side frontal airbag will be replaced with an alternate inflator. |
|---|
Related searches
Common ways people look up the Mitsubishi Pajero. Each link runs the search and lands on the relevant section of this report.
Related reliability guides
See where this model sits against other Mitsubishi reports by MOT failure rate and common problem area.
Compare high-confidence model reports across all makes.
Use the fleet mileage baseline before checking this model's own mileage table.
Compare this model's age pattern with the wider MOT baseline.
Sources used: DVSA MOT tests (Apr 2026); vehicle recalls (Apr 2026); MOT fault wording (May 2025). These are patterns from many MOT tests and recall notices. They help you decide what to inspect and what to ask; they do not certify the condition of one specific car.